Medical and psychiatric expert evidence is distinct from country condition, persecution, and human rights expert reports. This page signposts the distinction — immigrationexpertreports.com does not instruct or provide medical expert services.
Article 3 medical deportation cases engage authorities including Paposhvili [2017] CJEU and Savran [2021] UKSC. Medical evidence on treatment availability, clinical prognosis, and care standards in the country of origin is essential where the claim turns on medical risk on return.
Country and human rights experts address conditions, state healthcare infrastructure, and policy — not clinical assessment of the appellant's medical condition. Solicitors should instruct medical experts through specialist medico-legal providers alongside country or human rights experts where both dimensions are engaged.
Where a case involves torture survivors or PTSD, psychiatric evidence may support credibility and Article 3 analysis but does not replace country condition evidence on return risk. Coordinate instruction timelines to meet tribunal exchange deadlines.
Related Resources
- Human rights violation reports
- Deportation & removal
- CPIN & Country Guidance
- Report standards
- Network directory
- How to instruct
- Contact us
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need a medical expert alongside a country expert?
In Article 3 medical/deportation cases (Paposhvili, Savran), medical evidence on treatment availability in the country of origin is essential. This is separate from country condition analysis — instruct both where engaged.
Where do I find medical experts for immigration cases?
Medical experts for immigration tribunals are typically instructed through specialist medico-legal providers. This site signposts the distinction; country and human rights experts address conditions, not clinical assessment.